The Advantageous and Ill Effects of Working for Intelligence Service

The Advantages and Ill Effects of Working for Intelligence Services

One of the things we did were visit the, where daily visits were made to the American and the, and the Russian and the British Embassies. Those were regular visits that were made. The, although Russia was supposedly our friend, we were, you know it was, we were always on the lookout as to what was happening there.
The Air Force Intelligence, we were a close-knit group, well, I can't say that we were very demonstrative though, the fact that we were close-knit. But they, I know when my brother was drowned, my brother was drowned in 1945 trying to save another man. He was 16.
They took up a collection for me to go home and, and they were very supportive of me afterwards. They didn't, they made sure that, you know, that I was taken out to Murray's Restaurant for lunch once in a while. Murray's Restaurant was just down the corner from where we worked, and, but Murray's Restaurant was, you never saw a man in there, hardly ever. It was a women's restaurant. Men were gone, all the civil service people were women. But the odd time, at lunch time, you'd see men, but never at night. It was, but, no, and they were very good to, you know, very good that way. We were close and, but we were told to never, the majority of us lived, if we had homes nearby, or lived off-base, but we never went home ‘til after the late news, some of us. Were told the ones of us, you know, sometimes we were told by our boss not to, in case we would spill the news, Matthew Halton reported the news. He was the war correspondent.
His reports from overseas were accurate to what we had on the table, which was top secret.
If he said, "They took, the Canadians took a hill today," or, or, or, you know, or, "smashed so many German tanks," or "invaded a church," or whatever, or, "somewhere in Holland," or, "somewhere in France," he'd never give the location, but he would say, "Somewhere in." But he was right on target.

Interviewer: You had already all that information?

I had that information, but that's why we weren't allowed to be anywhere when news was being broadcast. Because we could, you know, just human nature would sometimes rise to the fore and you'd just spill the beans and you weren't supposed to.
It was an interesting experience, although, the one thing, though, that it does do to you is that when you work with people that are questioning other people and questioning why things are being done, and you know that you're, intelligence is all questions, a lot of questioning, it sort of spoils your life because you sum up people rather quickly, I think. I think it, it makes you come to a conclusion faster than you would normally. I don't know if it's good insight that I, as far as I'm concerned, but I do know that, that, I mean, you ask a lot of questions and I think luckily my husband was a military person so I could be curt and, you know, ask questions and get away with it. And he would understand, and, and I think, too, that it spoils your social life. I think for that, maybe I'm wrong in that. Maybe it just affected me that way, I don't know, but.
At the time, I, I mean I had, I mean he, my husband-to-be, later on, was there through all the conflict, the Normandy, the European Campaign, and I knew every step he was taking.
If you didn't hear that he was dead, you knew he didn't die and that you would get the reports that, you know, I mean the families would have the reports that he had died, they had died, so you would hear through the families that they had, that news soon spreads. But, but you knew they were in conflict and it wasn't an easy conflict so.

Interviewer: So you could follow his every step?

Yeah, that's right, yep.