Appendix C – Comparison of Rehabilitation Programs and/or Financial Benefits between VAC and Allied Countries Footnote 48
| Comparison Country | Program Similarities | Program Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison Country | VAC | ||
| Australia |
|
Participants can choose between choice of loss-of-earnings capacity or impairment based | Participants do not have the choice of earnings loss replacement methods |
| Participants are not able to choose service provider | Participants are able to choose service provider | ||
| Case Managers approve but do not create the rehabilitation plan | Case Managers create rehabilitation plans | ||
| United Kingdom |
|
Longer length in service equates to more benefits | Length in service does not equate to more benefits |
| The earnings loss benefitsFootnote 49 continues for life | Earnings Loss Benefit stops at age 65 | ||
The earnings loss benefit is based on:
|
The Earnings Loss Benefit is based on:
|
||
| Externally resourced | Internally and externally resourced | ||
| United States |
|
Internally resourced Focuses mainly on vocational rehabilitation |
Internally and externally resourced Focuses on medical, psycho-social, and vocational rehabilitation |